International Journal of Reciprocal Symmetry and Theoretical Physics

Peer Reviewed Article

Vol. 7 (2020)

Automating SAP GTS Compliance through AI-Powered Reciprocal Symmetry Models

Submitted
6 December 2024
Published
13-06-2020

Abstract

This research automates and optimizes trade compliance operations using SAP Global Trade Services (GTS) and AI-powered reciprocal symmetry models. The paper examines how reciprocal symmetry models may increase compliance efficiency, regulatory adaptation, and risk management in global trade operations. AI model scalability and predictiveness in SAP GTS are secondary goals. This secondary data-based evaluation examines current research and case studies to determine if AI can change trade compliance systems. Significant results show that AI models boost operational efficiency by automating compliance duties, proactively recognizing hazards, and rapidly adapting to regulatory changes. These models improve complicated trade data management decision support and scalability. Data quality, system integration, and the high cost of AI implementation were noted as issues. Policy implications underline the need for explicit AI use norms in trade compliance, data security, privacy, and human monitoring to assure responsibility. The study found that incorporating reciprocal symmetry models into SAP GTS transforms trade compliance, allowing organizations to remain compliant while improving operational agility. Still, sustainable deployment requires continual policy creation and research.

References

  1. Accorsi, R., Lowis, L., Sato, Y. (2011). Automated Certification for Compliant Cloud-based Business Processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(3), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0155-7
  2. Danaher, J. (2018). Toward an Ethics of AI Assistants: an Initial Framework. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0317-3
  3. Devarapu, K., Rahman, K., Kamisetty, A., & Narsina, D. (2019). MLOps-Driven Solutions for Real-Time Monitoring of Obesity and Its Impact on Heart Disease Risk: Enhancing Predictive Accuracy in Healthcare. International Journal of Reciprocal Symmetry and Theoretical Physics, 6, 43-55. https://upright.pub/index.php/ijrstp/article/view/160
  4. Karanam, R. K., Natakam, V. M., Boinapalli, N. R., Sridharlakshmi, N. R. B., Allam, A. R., Gade, P. K., Venkata, S. G. N., Kommineni, H. P., & Manikyala, A. (2018). Neural Networks in Algorithmic Trading for Financial Markets. Asian Accounting and Auditing Advancement, 9(1), 115–126. https://4ajournal.com/article/view/95
  5. Kommineni, H. P. (2019). Cognitive Edge Computing: Machine Learning Strategies for IoT Data Management. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 8(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.18034/ajase.v8i1.123
  6. Kothapalli, S., Manikyala, A., Kommineni, H. P., Venkata, S. G. N., Gade, P. K., Allam, A. R., Sridharlakshmi, N. R. B., Boinapalli, N. R., Onteddu, A. R., & Kundavaram, R. R. (2019). Code Refactoring Strategies for DevOps: Improving Software Maintainability and Scalability. ABC Research Alert, 7(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.18034/ra.v7i3.663
  7. Kuleshov, V., Ding, J., Vo, C., Hancock, B., Ratner, A. (2019). A Machine-compiled Database of Genome-wide Association Studies. Nature Communications, 10, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11026-x
  8. Kundavaram, R. R., Rahman, K., Devarapu, K., Narsina, D., Kamisetty, A., Gummadi, J. C. S., Talla, R. R., Onteddu, A. R., & Kothapalli, S. (2018). Predictive Analytics and Generative AI for Optimizing Cervical and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Data-Centric Approach. ABC Research Alert, 6(3), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.18034/ra.v6i3.672
  9. Mahendrawathi, E. R., Hanggara, B. T., Astuti, H. M. (2019). Model for BPM Implementation Assessment: Evidence from Companies in Indonesia. Business Process Management Journal, 25(5), 825-859. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2016-0160
  10. Meijler, T. D., Nytun, J. P., Prinz, A., Wortmann, H. (2010). Supporting Fine-grained Generative Model-driven Evolution. Software and Systems Modeling, 9(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-009-0144-1
  11. Mendling, J., Decker, G., Hull, R., Reijers, H. A., Weber, I. (2018). How do Machine Learning, Robotic Process Automation, and Blockchains Affect the Human Factor in Business Process Management?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 43, 19. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04319
  12. Rodriguez, M., Mohammed, M. A., Mohammed, R., Pasam, P., Karanam, R. K., Vennapusa, S. C. R., & Boinapalli, N. R. (2019). Oracle EBS and Digital Transformation: Aligning Technology with Business Goals. Technology & Management Review, 4, 49-63. https://upright.pub/index.php/tmr/article/view/151
  13. Sedlácek, M. (2013). Impacts of the Global Crisis Period 2007- 2010 on the Automotive Industry in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2013.02.08
  14. Simon, J. P. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Scope, Players, Markets and Geography. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(3), 208-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-08-2018-0039
  15. Tabatabaei, S. G. H., Dastjerdi, A. V., Kadir, W. M. N. W., Ibrahim, S., Sarafian, E. (2010). Security Conscious AI-planning-based Composition of Semantic Web Services. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 6(3), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/17440081011070150
  16. Thompson, C. R., Talla, R. R., Gummadi, J. C. S., Kamisetty, A (2019). Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Robotics. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 8(1), 85-96. https://ajase.net/article/view/94
  17. Wagholikar, K. B., Sundararajan, V., Deshpande, A. W. (2012). Modeling Paradigms for Medical Diagnostic Decision Support: A Survey and Future Directions. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(5), 3029-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9780-4

Similar Articles

21-30 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)